The Crisis brewing in Supply Chain Solutions space

Note: As a standard practice, I will include a plagiarism detection link in all the articles on my blog site. You can use the online tool below to evaluate any article published on the web for plagiarized content. All you have to do is to paste the url of the article there and it will go through every sentence in the article and flag any plagiarism. I believe as a follower of “writer’s integrity” I should include this tool in all my articles:

https://smallseotools.com/plagiarism-checker/

—————————————————————————————————–

The inspiration to write this post comes from a “Brand Boost” initiative I saw from one of the Supply Chain solutions provider yesterday.

The Competition intensifies with every passing day

A couple of weeks ago, I posted a video on LinkedIn with the theme that Analytics solutions and services are currently the most competitive market currently. And this should be a no brainer even in the Supply Chain space, if you follow Supply Chain solutions space. In fact, it is much more competitive and fierce than some other functions. This is ironic because in my mind, Supply Chain has been a laggard in adopting recent advances in analytics. So where is the intense competition coming from ? Well, two aspects are in play: One, the legacy providers like JDA (now Blue Yonder) still exist (though in an evolved form), and the classic optimization based tools hence are still flooding the market (this does not mean that they are not needed-they are). The second aspect is that as technology became mature and easily available, many ex-employees at these companies ended up floating their own platforms. Subsequently, we are in a situation where there are hundreds of different brands in Supply Chain solutions space, each promising to solve the same set of problems.

And new solutions are still coming out on a daily basis. Why ? Because the Analytics hype means that if you market it well enough, you will either have a good base of initial clients or get a good exit through an accquisition. That works for new entrants as they can cash in on the hype. But it makes the life of established major players much more difficult. Each new solution that comes into the Market is like a new car. Comparing tech on 2015 car with tech on a 2020 car will never work favorably for the 2015 car. 😀

Can you see the cliff yet ?

But the party will not last for very long. More than an year ago as well, I used an example of AtoML tools in one of my articles on LinkedIn emphasizing the same point. When you see the start of the fierce competition in AutoML, Enterprise AI or Supply Chain solutions space, you know where it is going.

The players in this intensly competitive space will consolidate through M&A. So if you recently entered the foray and if your purpose was not to make a quick buck, you just wasted your time developing something that is now easily available and in next two years, will be entirely commoditized.

Anyways, so the mayhem has begun. The Market will consolidate. Smaller player may actually benefit. I see some of them are very much under the radar and pretty lucrative from their capabilities perspective and complement the capabilities of some of the existing big players.

Also, I see some of these companies as good candidates for accquisition by large companies, who can then very rapidly reporpose them to build their own platforms leveraging these. Some of the capabilities built can provided competitive edge.

But the main challenge is being faced by Big player

Life cycles of Supply Chain solutions have become extremely short. And that makes it much more difficult for big players. All of them were startups at one point and as a startup, their technology was new and shiny, which allowed them to grab clients and markets faster. But then some other poster boy comes along.

They have then only two options. Either consistently expand their portfolio with what is hot (ex:Llamasoft expanding into Enterprise AI) or enhance capabilities of their existing systems and go though a major brand boost exercise (ex: JDA-Blue Yonder and o9 Solutions). The challenge however is, that there is no end to this strategy. The “Car example” I used above will always be into play. Each new entrant grabs market from and challenges the current dominant player. You can imagine the extremely short popularity cycle of this space from the fact that relatively new entrants also have to go through “Brand boost”, around the same time as very old (relatively) players like JDA rebranded themselves as Blue Yonder.

But what is the way out then ?

Partnerships- and consistent pipelines of unique solutions from those partnerships.

The Market has coined the term “solution” for these platforms. But now that there are hundreds of them. Most of them with similar functions and functionalities and each new incumbent may offer better functionalities with significantly lower fees. In order to stay relevant and/or retain ledership, organizations will have to create true solutions. There are two aspects of it:

What type of partnerships and how those partnerships will help is out of the scope of this article. But the gist is that the only way forward in this extremely competitive market is consistently developing new solutions, that can only be done by forging very close partnerships with clients across Industries.


Views expressed are my own.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s